Let the layout do the talking
Here is a slide from a presentation I was delivering on the opportunity to compress a message with a visual. As I was reflecting on this contrast, there is a deeper meaning yet that can be even more useful: the contrast between propositional vs. relational elements. Here is what I mean.
“I love New York” is a proposition, and to understand it, you have to process its syntax and retrieve the meaning of each word from semantic memory. This offering is cognitively expensive. By contrast, the other composition presents the same idea by arranging elements in space, and the brain encodes them as a single relational unit rather than three linguistic components. This makes a massive difference in memory because when elements are physically and semantically linked and emotionally charged, the hippocampus (the part of the brain that binds memories) stores them in a tight, special cluster, indicating firmly and fast that “these things go together.” This is one of the reasons why symbols often outlast paragraphs.
As a practical guideline, consider this: when you share with your audiences statements that are important to remember, instead of just sharing propositions, look for ways to “stage” your ideas if they show relationships like cause and effect. Overlap them, scale them, or link them in some way. This way, you might even remove arrows (which can add a cognitive step), and eliminate cliché words like “drive” (e.g., as in, “hard work drives success”). Place things so the brain cannot imagine apart.