Seen before vs. remembered later
On the surface, this slide, which is from a client’s presentation on the topic of workflow automation, is not bad. Which is the problem. The slide is competent and clean, but overall, so cliché, would you agree? The slide does suggest modern work and includes what we call consensus imagery, meaning no one has any reason to object to the image choice. Nothing here is wrong, but nothing sticks either. A slide like this is problematic because it triggers schema memory (“I’ve seen this before”) instead of episodic memory, which is how we remember specific moments or experiences.
There are a few ways to fix this for those who want to be original in an unoriginal world. One way is to think in specifics and visualize those. For example, if the slide talks about the importance of automation, we can ask: What would a human do at 6:42 pm that automation removes?
Another way is to consider that in this slide, everything is calm: calm people, calm plants, calm colors, calm message, calm statistic. If we could keep 80% calm and perhaps disturb 20%, we can offer the brain something less predictable. Otherwise, calm slides can create calm forgetting.