Does shocking content always get attention?
A few years back, a PR agency in Sydney, Australia, organized a social experiment for a bank. They hung money in a tree in a popular park and waited to see what would happen. The behaviors ranged from not noticing at all to noticing but being too busy to stop. Then you had the predictable social proof behavior, meaning that once a few people stopped to look, more did, and once a few people started taking the money, more did as well. What caught my attention about this experiment is that the first 100 people did not notice anything at all.
So if people are missing money growing on trees, what else are they missing—especially in business communication, which is rarely that exciting? And how do we get others to notice what is essential?
One thing to consider is that the money was too far outside people’s prediction models. Their brains didn’t expect it, so they didn’t register it. In corporate content, this happens when we try too hard to be different without first giving the brain a cue that says: “This is relevant. This is for you.” You must earn the right to surprise.
So, anchor first, then surprise the brain because the brain needs to know where to look before it decides what is worth noticing.